- Capture high-defintion video to MiniDV
- 10x optical zoom; SuperRange Optical Image Stabilizer
- 24p Cinema Mode; 30p Progressive Mode
- 2.7-inch widescreen Multi-Angle Vivid LCD
- Simultaneous photo capture
More detail ...
-3CCDs
-L Series Fluorite Lens
-All Manual Controls
-Progressive Scan
-Optical Stabilization
-Large Manual Focus Ring
Of course we all know that 3CCDs are far better than one... I need not go into more depth there. As far as the lens goes some have argued that they see no difference of quality over that of Sony's. This may be due in part to the fact that they are looking for a difference in resolution. When compared in numbers to some of the 3CCD models of Sony you may think that this is a lower resolution camera (which can be a very deceiving thing). It is recognized that a camera with a high resolution in numbers does not equal a pleasing or sharper image. When you compare the color of a Sony and this GL1 (or any other Canon against a Sony for that matter) there will be no comparison. The Sony will inevitably lean towards the blues giving a very cold unnatural feeling which can often result in having to waste time in post by adding color corrections. The Canon will have a much warmer more natural coloring. With deeper richer blacks.
The Progressive Scan (or frame mode) is beautiful. It gives the footage a much more film like jitteriness instead of the liquid smooth interlaced footage that is usually the only option you have on most Sony camera models. It is called "frame mode" because it captures 30 FULL frames per second instead of 60 FIELDS per second (top field and bottom field) being joined together to make the 30 frames which when slowed down will show interlaced lines. Some say ...that Progressive Scan is only meant for a "digital motor drive" where you capture 30 frames per second with the intent of getting still pictures from it. Yes this is a possibility... but no video is not really high resolution enough to use this for any real purpose other than having a somewhat grainy image for a home web site. I have not heard of ANY professional using it for anything other than to shoot a real project as true video footage. Video to film transfer locations prefer people to use progressive scan to shoot on their GL1 or XL1 for film transfer. It loses much less quality in the process. There are many commercials and documentaries (as well as independent films) which have started shooting in progressive scan on the GL1 and XL1 in order to get the higher budget film look.
The manual controls on this camera give you such control that you can achieve truly professional results. You have control over - Shutter Speed Aperture Gain White Balance Focus exposure etc. If you want the choppy effect of Saving Private Ryan or Gladiator's battle scenes just up the shutter speed to 250 or higher. Or if you want a lot of background blur open the lens way up.
Ah yes... the image stabilization. You won't get anything close to it on other brands. They all have a slight shake and jitter never truly stabilizing it especially when zoomed. This one has none. It only floats. And of course if you want that jittery handheld look of some of the new films and such just turn it off. But when you want smooth non jittery handheld shots it's always there.
If you are trying to decide what camera to get always go down the Canon road. Almost all of them have features that Sony only tries to make up for with home userish built effects and such cheesy non-professional effects that one can achieve if they have a computer to edit on (and still want the effects by then. Why record it permanently when you might change your mind later). Some Sony users complain about how Canon does not have good still picture resolution. I say "who needs still pictures on a camcorder??" That should be left to 35mm or a digital camera devoted to that form of media alone. I have yet to see a printable good looking still even from a Sony. Both the video format and the small included memory cards cannot handle the resolution required of this. With all the manual controls the far superior color and the incredible look of progressive scan one must have only the choice to go Canon. If you are an aspiring documentary or commercial maker trying to decide between a GL1 and an XL1 (not likely) the advantage of the GL1 (besides the price) is that it is small. This allows you to be in crowds shooting without stares from everybody. Or shoot where you would otherwise be unable. This can also be a downfall. It may look wimpy to the client (of course once they see the footage they will probably buy one themselves). ....
Lastly I just want to say that I would highly recommend this camera but if you can afford it go with the XL1 (...) it is even better!More detail ...
This is however NOT a camera that the general public should buy. It's far to expensive and really wouldn't be worth it to someone who will be using this for filming say a birthday party. There are many features on this camera which make it as wonderful as it is but these features would likely be unused by someone new to video cameras. So if you are in this boat save your money and get a different camera.
What's great about it? The image quality is better than anything I've seen before. With 3CCD it's good. Unlike the XL-1S the GL2 has a 2.5 inch color LCD. However I rarely use this. It takes up more battery power and you can't see it when there's sunlight. I love the audio controls and how it's not only stereo microphone but you can control the levels of your left and right audio right there on the camera. I love to convert analogue video into digitial video and it's almost too easy using the GL2. It's great for getting your older stuff into a digital format and being able to easily get it onto your computer.
What's bad about it? Really not a whole lot. The 1.7-megapixel photo mode is really uneeded. 1.7-megapixels really isn't that good. The included 8MB card for these pictures isn't enough. If you're going to want to take digital pictures then get a digital still camera and don't use the GL2 as a still camera.
But I can't stress enough that if you aren't going to use this for more professional projects then you really shouldn't get this camera.More detail ...